![]() I haven't listened to Aaron's stuff yet, so I honestly don't know if these are better, but I'd be a biased judge. This needs to be remastered, but how about these songs? If Pro Tools didn't have hardware-dependent limitations on voicings, and was VST-compatible, then I think your situation is more likely. I also think that if you took somebody into a vacuum, and gave them the necessary hardware for Pro Tools (either LE or M-Powered, which are the actual competing products in the amateur/hobbyist market), and then gave them a choice and full information about what the different software packages, I bet most wouldn't go for Pro Tools. Remember that Pro Tools was out and in studios a good 3-4 years before most of its current competitors even showed up: a lot of them didn't even do audio until 2-3 versions in. I still think it has a lot to do with early-onset pervasiveness. ![]() If it wasn't for that, I'm sure a lot more amteur and home recording guys would be using it. It just gets a lot of hate because digidesign require you to purchase hardware with it. It has a lot less to do with marketing than people chalk it up to. ![]() But on topic, there's a reason why Pro Tools is basically the "industry standard" in the pro audio world. Speaking of USB dongles, mine, with all of my pro tools licenses went missing yesterday, along with the computer some asshole broke into my house and stole. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |